Search Linux Wireless

Re: Wifi-Event for when initial 4-way completes?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Ben,

Yes, you are right. There is a case when wpa supplicant is in connected state

but the last EAPOL to AP was lost. Client won't be able to communicate and AP will

deauthenticate after a while or not. It's easily reproducible with a frame corrupter

patch I have sent some time ago. The worst case is when last EAPOL is lost and

deauthentication frame from AP as well. It can leave client in dead state for

minutes.


I have been debugging such case reported by our customers and it turns out

that supplicant is using L2 send for EAPOL messages without any feedback from

mac80211 layer. It means that client has no idea whether these frames have

been acked or not. AP (in mac80211) is using nl command and gets the status of the ack

although it's not the last message in the chain.

I have made a patch to send EAPOL on the station with same command as AP

and check for this case i.e. deauthenticate immediately when client is in

connected state but last EAPOL hasn't been acked.

I will try to send it upstream as soon as it's cleaned up a bit.

Br,

Wojtek


On 08/06/17 17:41, Ben Greear wrote:
On 06/08/2017 08:21 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
On 06/07/2017 12:25 AM, Wojciech Dubowik wrote:
Hello Ben,

I have been using this part of wpa_supplicant to notify that 4-Way handshake is completed.

around line 868 in wpa_supplicant.c

#if defined(CONFIG_CTRL_IFACE) || !defined(CONFIG_NO_STDOUT_DEBUG)
wpa_msg(wpa_s, MSG_INFO, WPA_EVENT_CONNECTED "- Connection to "
                        MACSTR " completed [id=%d id_str=%s%s]",
                        MAC2STR(wpa_s->bssid),
                        ssid ? ssid->id : -1,
                        ssid && ssid->id_str ? ssid->id_str : "",
                        fils_hlp_sent ? " FILS_HLP_SENT" : "");
#endif /* CONFIG_CTRL_IFACE || !CONFIG_NO_STDOUT_DEBUG */

You can pack whatever notification message inside the if statement.

I'm not sure that actually is correct? For instance, I see this in a case where
WPA-2 was not succesfully negotiated (note the reason-2 disconnect)

IFNAME=sta9 <3>SME: Trying to authenticate with 00:0e:8e:f8:73:96 (SSID='ota-9k-2 space' freq=5180 MHz) IFNAME=sta9 <3>Trying to associate with 00:0e:8e:f8:73:96 (SSID='ota-9k-2 space' freq=5180 MHz)
IFNAME=sta9 <3>Associated with 00:0e:8e:f8:73:96
IFNAME=sta9 <3>CTRL-EVENT-SUBNET-STATUS-UPDATE status=0
IFNAME=sta9 <3>WPA: Key negotiation completed with 00:0e:8e:f8:73:96 [PTK=CCMP GTK=CCMP] IFNAME=sta9 <3>CTRL-EVENT-CONNECTED - Connection to 00:0e:8e:f8:73:96 completed [id=0 id_str=] IFNAME=sta9 <3>WPA: Key negotiation completed with 00:0e:8e:f8:73:96 [PTK=CCMP GTK=CCMP] IFNAME=sta9 <3>WPA: Key negotiation completed with 00:0e:8e:f8:73:96 [PTK=CCMP GTK=CCMP] IFNAME=sta9 <3>WPA: Key negotiation completed with 00:0e:8e:f8:73:96 [PTK=CCMP GTK=CCMP]
IFNAME=sta9 <3>CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=00:0e:8e:f8:73:96 reason=2


Looks like I might need to add another message about EAPOL 4-way completing?

Based on a sniff, it seems that the 3/4 was sent in this case, but the 4/4 was not received from the AP. Maybe the 3/4 is (re)sent incorrectly sometimes....I have run into similar
bugs in the past.

Thanks,
Ben






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux