> > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 06:31:01AM +0000, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote: > > Hi, > > Hi, > > > True, OTOH we need tid to be 8 sometimes. We *just* need to make sure > > that we don't index tid_data with this. Hence I think the proper fix is: > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/tx.c > > b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/tx.c > > index 06ac3f1..16a8646 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/tx.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/tx.c > > @@ -1190,11 +1190,11 @@ void iwlagn_rx_reply_tx(struct iwl_priv *priv, > struct iwl_rx_cmd_buffer *rxb) > > next_reclaimed; > > IWL_DEBUG_TX_REPLY(priv, "Next reclaimed packet:%d\n", > > next_reclaimed); > > + iwlagn_check_ratid_empty(priv, sta_id, tid); > > } > > > > iwl_trans_reclaim(priv->trans, txq_id, ssn, &skbs); > > > > - iwlagn_check_ratid_empty(priv, sta_id, tid); > > freed = 0; > > > > /* process frames */ > > I can confirm it works. You can add my Tested-By. Patch in review in our internal tree. It'll be upstreamed through the regular process. Thanks for your report and debug work.
