(Removing the X letters from the subject to bypass vger filters)
Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> These external functions are for BT-coexistence, so remove the "hal"
>> prefix for consistancy.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Birming Chiu <birming@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Shaofu <shaofu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Steven Ting <steventing@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> On my inbox I see four different versions of this patch 2 but on
> patchwork I only see one, but with a different date than rest of the
> patches in this series and hence is wrong order. What happened, did you
> perhaps delete some of the patches from patchwork?
>
> But anyway, if there are accidental multiple patch submissions please
> always submit the whole series again as v2. Resubmitting is the most
> reliable method to make sure that I apply the correct version of
> patches, anything is else is just confusing me and increases the chances
> that I apply the wrong version.
Hehe, so I think I now understand what happened:
<linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: host vger.kernel.org[209.132.180.67] said:
550 5.7.1 Content-Policy reject msg: The capital Triple-X in subject is way
too often associated with junk email, please rephrase. BF:<H 0>;
S1751112AbdFEOtn (in reply to end of DATA command)
But anyway, please resubmit the whole series as v2.
--
Kalle Valo
