Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 11:38 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: >> CoDel can be too aggressive if a station sends at a very low rate, >> leading reduced throughput. This gets worse the more stations are >> present, as each station gets more bursty the longer the round-robin >> scheduling between stations takes. >> > [...] > > I've applied this now (with some minor fixups) - the whole discussion > didn't really conclude in anything, and we can just try it. Okidoki. FWIW, the reason I never got any further was that my experiments with other approaches proved somewhat inconclusive. Partly because a reorganisation of my testbed has caused the physical conditions to change which has caused the original problem to be less severe. So yeah, some wider testing would be good, and I agree that it is low risk. I'll revisit this myself at some point after I get my testbed rebased on a new kernel and figure out why the physical conditions changed... :) -Toke
