Is it advisable to re-submit with the noted corrections fixed?
On 18/05/17 15:47, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Tom Gaudasiński <tomg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Make Epson WN7512BEP work by adding its device-id to rt2800usb. Device
>> contains a Ralink RT3071L, registers as vendor Accton/Arcadyan.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tom Gaudasinski <tomg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> The prefix should be "rt2x00:".
>
>> --- linux/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800usb.c.orig
>> 2017-05-17 19:49:44.893895819 +1000
>> +++ linux/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800usb.c 2017-05-17
>> 19:49:32.906111192 +1000
>> @@ -1156,6 +1156,8 @@ static struct usb_device_id rt2800usb_de
>> { USB_DEVICE(0x2001, 0x3c17) },
>> /* Panasonic */
>> { USB_DEVICE(0x083a, 0xb511) },
>> + /* Accton/Arcadyan/Epson */
>> + { USB_DEVICE(0x083a, 0xb512) },
> The patch looks to be corrupted, didn't it test it though. Better use
> 'git send-email' to submit patches.
>
