On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 11:41:05AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > iwlegacy firmware can crash when power save is configured. PS was
> > allowed in "dbdac2b iwlegacy: properly enable power saving" with belive
> > that user who enable PS is aware of that and can relate firmware crahes
> > with PS. However some distributions seems to enable PS without user
> > intervention, so warn about that.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.c | 2 ++
> > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.c
> > index 140b6ea..6aaa0e7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.c
> > @@ -5147,6 +5147,8 @@ void il_mac_flush(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
> >
> > if (changed & (IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_PS | IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_IDLE)) {
> > il->power_data.ps_disabled = !(conf->flags & IEEE80211_CONF_PS);
> > + WARN_ONCE(!il->power_data.ps_disabled,
> > + "Enabling power save might cause firmware crashes\n");
>
> This prints the whole stack trace, right? Isn't that excessive and
> fooling the users to think that they found a bug, which would mean more
> bug reports sent to us? So maybe a simple printk is better here?
I wanted to have back trace to assure problem will not be missed, but
I think you have right, I'll post v2.
Thanks
Stanislaw
