On 4/26/2017 10:49 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
FWIW:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jberg/mac80211-next.git/commit/?id=978812b3f43dda86e20588cfe0a4a244c4fab141
On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 10:46 +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
Sure. In the worker we are already iterating so I guess we could.
The number of internal fields in struct cfg80211_sched_scan_request
with one of them being the list_head. Thinking about hiding those
from the drivers. Is it worth it?
I guess it could be done, but I'm tending towards doing that less
again, I have no strong preference in this case. If it was something
that seems likely to get abused, perhaps, but here...
Ok. As long as drivers don't think they can use the list_head to push it
on a private list. The internal use comment does not end up in
kerneldoc. So maybe we can improve that? Would work for me.
Regards,
Arend
