On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 16:05 +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote: > Sure. It was just to mention that attribute 0 exists somewhere. > The other 0 attribute is OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_ID. That looks like some really awkward hand-grown parsing - with all these "struct ovs_len_tbl" looking almost like a policy, but not using that code? Seems like something somebody should take a hard look at and see if it can't use more standard infrastructure. johannes
