> I'm not against it. You;v decided that I'm fighting you because I gave > another solution. Ok, no, I'm not saying you shouldn't rewrite all the code to get rid of it, but I think you can use a patch like mine interim as such a rewrite is unlikely to go into 2.6.26, is it? > Frankly we probably don't need this allocation at all. maybe one skb > is just enough That would be nice, indeed. > even with my never dying hope all fragments are in skb fragment list. :) > This still probably won't save pci memory allocation problem Yeah, true, that one needs to be done, but it could probably be done only once when hw is probed rather than every time it is brought up. Most likely not something you'll get to fix in 2.6.26 either though. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
