On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Christian Lamparter
<chunkeey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Well, the patch could be as simple as this:
> ---
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 7869ae3837ca..44f7d5a1c67c 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -2450,6 +2450,9 @@ void __dev_kfree_skb_irq(struct sk_buff *skb, enum skb_free_reason reason)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
>
> + if (!skb)
> + return;
> +
> if (likely(atomic_read(&skb->users) == 1)) {
> smp_rmb();
> atomic_set(&skb->users, 0);
> ---
>
> The question is: would David or Eric support the change. Any comments,
> what's the prefered solution? Just patch __dev_kfree_skb_irq to make
> it consistent with *kfree*, or patch the driver? I'm fine either way,
> but I would prefere patching __dev_kfree_skb_irq.
This is fine, same check happens in consume_skb()
