On Mittwoch, 29. März 2017 13:53:06 CEST Johannes Berg wrote: [...] > > Not sure whether removing it in ieee80211_propagate_queue_wake will > > have other odd side effects with software queuing. Maybe Michal > > Kazior can tell us if it is safe to remove it. > > No, it's the other way around. > > Michal's patches correctly added a test for this to > __ieee80211_stop_queue(), the only missing thing is that this test > should also be in ieee80211_do_open() like this: > > diff --git a/net/mac80211/iface.c b/net/mac80211/iface.c > index 40813dd3301c..5bb0c5012819 100644 > --- a/net/mac80211/iface.c > +++ b/net/mac80211/iface.c > @@ -718,7 +718,8 @@ int ieee80211_do_open(struct wireless_dev *wdev, bool coming_up) > ieee80211_recalc_ps(local); > > if (sdata->vif.type == NL80211_IFTYPE_MONITOR || > - sdata->vif.type == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP_VLAN) { > + sdata->vif.type == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP_VLAN || > + local->ops->wake_tx_queue) { > /* XXX: for AP_VLAN, actually track AP queues */ > netif_tx_start_all_queues(dev); > } else if (dev) { Yes, this also works. Kind regards, Sven
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.