On Tue, 2017-03-07 at 12:15 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, 2017-03-07 at 12:12 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > Since ACPI does support _DSD we might have a firmware that provides > > a > > GPIO mapping in DSDT. When GPIO is requested the core will check for > > property with given name. That's why we have to follow the standard > > names which are already in use in DT case. > > > > Request GPIOs with proper connection IDs, i.e. use same names as > > used > > for DT case. > > > > In the future ACPI and DT cases might be unified. > > Discard this series, it should be v2, just resent. While I'm preparing v2, there is a most important question has arisen. Do we have any evidence of NXP5440 (ACPI ID) in *real* world? To me it (the ID itself) sounds artificial and wilfully invented. In case I'm right it must be removed from the driver. Otherwise, I would like to see documentation or alike with DSDT excerpt and model of the real device which has it. -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
