On 03/01/2017 08:33 PM, Luca Coelho wrote: > Hi Jens, > > On Mar 1, 2017 20:25, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Not that folks have been jumping all over this, but in case someone is > curious, it triggered twice here today. For those two times, the value > of mvm->pending_frames[sta_id] was 80 and 39, respectively. > > Sorry for the delay, I'm on vacation now with limited internet access. > But we'll take a look into this early next week at the latest. > > Thanks a lot for the detailed report! No worries, thanks for responding. I just wanted to ensure this wasn't dropped on the floor. BTW, a few more values of ->pending_frames[sta_id]: $ dmesg | grep "ret=" [ 2334.308254] ret=39 [ 7915.311828] ret=80 [31602.317204] ret=41 [32139.510993] ret=54 [33292.917759] ret=96 it seems to often happen around resume. -- Jens Axboe
