> The frequency ranges have been "rounded down" to conform with the > apparent convention of only including ranges used by standard 802.11 > channels, rather than using the actual frequency ranges as has been > done for some countries (and most 60GHz rules). My preference is the > latter so that there is a clear correlation between the regdb and > relevant documentation, and so that the regdb may become useful > beyond 802.11. With your blessing as maintainer I will also make this > change to the patch. I think that's just an artifact of the original database source and would also prefer the documented ranges to be used. johannes