Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 02/06/2017 06:45 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> There is a potential race condition when the control byte of a CAM >>> entry is written first. Write in reverse order to correct the condition. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: shaofu <shaofu@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> V2 - no changes >>> V3 - no changes >> >> I missed in my reply to v2 that you had already sent v3 from this >> patchset. Strange that I don't see this v3 patchset either in patchwork, >> only v1. >> >> Try submitting v4 in case it was just a temporary glitch in patchwork. >> But if that doesn't help I'll apply these manually. > > I have no idea why my patches are not getting handled by patchwork, > but V4 is not there either. Yeah, that's odd. I do see your patches on the mailing list so I guess something in this set is breaking patchwork's email parser. The only notable difference I saw that in our patches the tags were in this format: [PATCH 01/11 V4] But normally we use something like this: [PATCH V4 01/11] I don't know if that would cause patchwork to fail and I don't really have time to investigate it right now. I'll just apply V4 manually now and let's hope that the problem doesn't reappear. -- Kalle Valo
