On Thu, 2017-01-26 at 14:49 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > Oops, sorry - receive. We can only indicate "CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY", > nothing more advanced right now, but right now we'd indicate that if > the packet had 0x0000 in the checksum field, but should've had 0xffff. > > On TX I believe we actually do in HW exactly what your patch just did. Can you describe the visible effects of this problem ? Is that because of a conversion we might do later to CHECKSUM_COMPLETE ?
