On Thursday, January 12, 2017 10:16:00 AM CET Johannes Berg wrote: > And I realized only now that this was a different place ... Right, it was a few hundred randconfigs later after I had confirmed that the first patch fixed all the configurations that were broken at first. > I've just added the check you suggested - spent way too much time > already on this old crap Ok, thanks! Let's hope it doesn't come back once more. I'm still trying to categorize the newly added warnings in gcc-7, there a number of very useful warnings that got added, but some of them are rather noisy and find both a number of real bugs and false positives. The NULL check had only a few findings that all seemed worth fixing. Arnd