Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH 01/12] rfkill: clarify meaning of rfkill states

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 20:54:42 +0300, "Tomas Winkler" <tomasw@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
> <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 19:36:26 +0300, "Tomas Winkler" <tomasw@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> >> Cannot this be just fixed with ~ sed -s/ON/OFF/g'  over the kernel?
> >
> > Absolutely NOT!
> >
> > You would have patches in flight, not to mention out-of-tree
> > stuff, that you'd have no idea if they want the old or new meaning.
> >
> > Not to mention you'd never know what you forgot to convert, etc.
> >
> How many drivers today implement the rfkill interface? I guess no more
> then 10.

You missed the point.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux