Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Andrew Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Eric Biggers pointed out that the orinoco driver pointed scatterlists
>> at the stack.
>>
>> Fix it by switching from ahash to shash. The result should be
>> simpler, faster, and more correct.
>>
>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 4.9 only
>> Reported-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> 11 patches applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks.
>
> 1fef293b8a98 orinoco: Use shash instead of ahash for MIC calculations
> a08b98196a36 rt2800: make rx ampdu_factor depend on number of rx chains
> e49abb19d1bf rt2800: don't set ht parameters for non-aggregated frames
> a51b89698ccc rt2800: set minimum MPDU and PSDU lengths to sane values
> 8f03a7c6e7f9 rt2800: set MAX_PSDU len according to remote STAs capabilities
> 8845254112ac rt2800: rename adjust_freq_offset function
> bc0077053948 rt2800: warn if doing VCO recalibration for unknow RF chip
> 24d42ef3b152 rt2800: perform VCO recalibration for RF5592 chip
> d96324703ffa rt2x00: merge agc and vco works with link tuner
> eb79a8fe94c8 rt2800: replace mdelay by usleep on vco calibration.
> 31369c323ba0 rt2800: replace msleep() with usleep_range() on channel switch
Oh man, when I was applying rt2800 patches I did an off by one error
with my patchwork script ('commit 2-12' vs 'commit 1-11') and
accidentally applied this orinoco patch to wireless-drivers-next along
with the 10 rt2800 patches above. And failed to spot that before pushing
the tree :(
As this orinoco patch is pretty important I'll cherry pick it manually
to wireless-drivers also so that it goes to 4.10. This means that the
patch is in both trees, but just with a different commit id.
Sorry for the mess.
--
Kalle Valo
