On Saturday 24 December 2016 19:17:30 Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > In case there is no valid MAC address kernel generates random one.
> > This patch propagate this generated MAC address back to NVS data
> > which will be uploaded to wl1251 chip. So HW would have same MAC
> > address as linux kernel uses.
> >
> > return 0;
> >
> > }
> >
> > +static int wl1251_write_nvs_mac(struct wl1251 *wl)
> > +{
>
> The name is quite confusing, this sounds like writing into
> non-volatile storage.
>
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + if (wl->nvs_len < 0x24)
> > + return -ENODATA;
> > +
> > + /* length is 2 and data address is 0x546c (mask is 0xfffe) */
>
> You don't actually check for the mask.
It is quite complicated. { 0x6d, 0x54 } (= 0x546d) in data represent
address 0x546c and content are data. You need to apply mask 0xfffe for
0x546d and you get address where data will be written (so 0x546c).
> > + if (wl->nvs[0x19] != 2 || wl->nvs[0x1a] != 0x6d || wl->nvs[0x1b]
> > != 0x54) + return -EINVAL;
>
> You have two copies of these. Does it make sense to move it to helper
> function?
I'm thinking if checks is really needed. But probably moving it to
separate function is good idea.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
