On Fri, 2016-12-16 at 13:17 +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote: > > > I have no problem introducing a common storage for this, if > > necessary with some fields/nl attributes being optional, but I > > suspect this is actually a necessary part of gscan, otherwise > > you're not able to report all the necessary data? > > If you just look at the gscan api in wifihal then yes. I was just > wondering whether "all the necessary data" really comprises all these > from a use-case perspective. As an example the api also has rtt > fields, but both brcm and intel solutions do not report that. Yeah, no idea. Sorry - my wording wasn't quite precise. By "this is actually a necessary part of gscan" I meant the partial history reporting itself, not any particular field thereof. johannes
