Hello Christian, On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 05:38:02PM +0100, Christian Lamparter wrote: > On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 1:03:38 PM CET Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote: > > > On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 11:58:24 AM CET Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 10:52:45PM +0100, Christian Lamparter wrote: > > > > > @@ -409,10 +410,12 @@ void ath10k_debug_fw_stats_process(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb) > > > > > goto free; > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > + if (!list_empty(&stats.peers)) > > > > > > > > [shafi] sorry please correct me if i am wrong, for 'extended peer stats' we are checking > > > > for normal 'peer stats' ? Is this the fix intended, i had started a build to > > > > check your change and we will keep you posted, does this fix displaying > > > > 'rx_duration' in ath10k fw_stats. > > > The idea is not to queue any "extended peer stats" when there where no "peer stats" to > > > begin with. Because otherwise, the function is still vulnerable to OOM since the > > > extended peers stats will be queued unchecked (not that this is currently a problem). > > > > [shafi] list_splice_tail_init should still check for non-empty 'peers_extd' list > > and append if required ? please let me know if i am still missing something > Well, you can also count the entries in peers_extd and delete the old entries > if they start to overflow. If you want to do it differently, please go ahead. > [shafi] sorry for the delay (got stuck up with something else), I will add some prints explicitly and keep you posted ASAP. Since the extended peer stats gets updated periodically I would like to confirm the debug linked list associated to the extended peer stats does not overflows and potentially cause OOM. regards, shafi
