2016-11-16 13:02 GMT+01:00 Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 09:07:00AM +0100, Mathias Kresin wrote: >> Here are the results of the requested tests. Please keep in mind, I'm not in >> a lab environment: >> >> LEDE head >> connect >> action 0 sta 9c:f3:87:bc:AA:BB tid 6 buf_size 64 ampdu_factor 3 >> action 2 sta 9c:f3:87:bc:AA:BB tid 0 buf_size 0 ampdu_factor 3 >> action 6 sta 9c:f3:87:bc:AA:BB tid 0 buf_size 64 ampdu_factor 3 >> action 0 sta 9c:f3:87:bc:AA:BB tid 0 buf_size 64 ampdu_factor 3 > > No problem here - buf_size corresponds to ampdu_factor. > >> ieee80211 phy0: rt2x00queue_flush_queue: Warning - Queue 2 failed >> to flush >> ieee80211 phy0: rt2x00queue_flush_queue: Warning - Queue 2 failed >> to flush > > I think we do not give device enough time to post AMPDU consisted > with bigger amount of frames. If we want to increase ba_size we will > need also some other changes in the driver. Anyway I already request > Kalle to drop this patch. I assume other patches do not cause > regression for you, correct? Correct. Just 05/10 caused issues.
