"Vittorio Gambaletta (VittGam)" <linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Hello,
>
> On 12/10/2016 17:01:08 CEST, Valo, Kalle wrote:
>
>> So to tell the full story I'll change the commit log to something like
>> below. Does it look ok to you?
>
> Yes; but I'd change "So" to "This turned out to be wrong", and add a note
> about changing the order for 0x002A too:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ath9k: Really fix LED polarity for some Mini PCI AR9220 MB92 cards.
>
> The active_high LED of my Wistron DNMA-92 is still being recognized as
> active_low on 4.7.6 mainline. When I was preparing my former commit
> 0f9edcdd88a9 ("ath9k: Fix LED polarity for some Mini PCI AR9220 MB92
> cards.") to fix that I must have somehow messed up with testing, because
> I tested the final version of that patch before sending it, and it was
> apparently working; but now it is not working on 4.7.6 mainline.
>
> I initially added the PCI_DEVICE_SUB section for 0x0029/0x2096 above the
> PCI_VDEVICE section for 0x0029; but then I moved the former below the
> latter after seeing how 0x002A sections were sorted in the file.
>
> This turned out to be wrong: if a generic PCI_VDEVICE entry (that has
> both subvendor and subdevice IDs set to PCI_ANY_ID) is put before a more
> specific one (PCI_DEVICE_SUB), then the generic PCI_VDEVICE entry will
> match first and will be used.
>
> With this patch, 0x0029/0x2096 has finally got active_high LED on 4.7.6.
>
> While I'm at it, let's fix 0x002A too by also moving its generic definition
> below its specific ones.
>
> Fixes: 0f9edcdd88a9 ("ath9k: Fix LED polarity for some Mini PCI AR9220 MB92 cards.")
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> #4.7+
> Signed-off-by: Vittorio Gambaletta <linuxbugs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> [kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: improve the commit log based on email discussions]
> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks, I updated the commit with your changes.
--
Kalle Valo
