On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 03:33:24PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > > I think it would be reasonable only if the target channel is the > > > one we are using and we have done CSA. But when scanning non- > > > operative channels I don't think this could work. > > > this has been sleeping for a while.. :) > > Would it make sense to rebase it and resubmit it for inclusion? > > > > Given the previous discussion we could change the logic as: > > * always passively scan DFS channels that are not usable > > * always actively scan DFS channels that are usable (i.e. CAC was > > performed). > > Doesn't that contradict what you said above? > > If we scan, don't we possibly lose our CAC result anyway, since we went > off-channel? In FCC at least? In ETSI I think we're allowed to do that > for a bit? argh. ok, I think I had forgotten about this detail. > > Anyway, why not just always scan passively, to simplify? > Probably better..ok let's do it this way. Thanks ! -- Antonio Quartulli
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
