On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 20:59 +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote: > Me neither. I actually found it annoying to have all kernel-doc above > the type definition and indeed easy to miss fields. Now struct > ieee80211_hw is not alone and we have it all over the place in the > wireless subsystem. Is this something we want to embrace and maybe > find janitors/newbies/coccinelle-gurus to address it. Not sure if > coccinelle could deal with this. I don't think coccinelle can look into comments, though perhaps it could be used to *place* them - use kernel-doc script to extract them first, and then make that output a coccinelle script to place the comment back at the right spot? Overall though, not sure that's worth it over just doing it by hand once? Then again, that could be used to mass-convert more ... :) johannes
