> > Well, if your other patch to make it OK to be on-stack would be > > applied instead, this wouldn't make much sense either :) > > > > Yes but that one only fixes ccm not gcm Yes, but we can do the same for GCM, no? > > In this particular patch, we could reduce the size of the struct, > > but I > > don't actually think it'll make a difference to go from 48 to 36 > > bytes, > > given alignment etc., so I think I'll just leave it as is. > > > > I understand you are in a hurry, but this is unlikely to be the only > such issue. I will propose an 'auxdata' feature for the crypto api > that can be used here, but also for any other occurrence where client > data assoiciated with the request can no longer be allocated on the > stack No objections. I'll merge this anyway today I think, reverting is easy later. johannes
