> On 17 Oct 2016, at 10:35, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Mon, 2016-10-17 at 10:30 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> >> Yes. But as I replied, setting the req size is not supported atm, >> although it is reasonable to demand a way to allocate additional data >> in the request specifically for this issue. So let's proceed with the >> aead_request_alloc/free patch, but I would like to propose something >> on the API side to address this particular issue > > Well, if your other patch to make it OK to be on-stack would be applied > instead, this wouldn't make much sense either :) > > In this particular patch, we could reduce the size of the struct, but I > don't actually think it'll make a difference to go from 48 to 36 bytes, > given alignment etc., so I think I'll just leave it as is. > > johannes
