Petri Gynther <pgynther@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > $ iwconfig mlan0 essid MySSID > [ 36.930000] Path: /sbin/iwconfig > [ 36.930000] CPU: 0 PID: 203 Comm: iwconfig Not tainted 4.7.0 #2 > [ 36.940000] task: 866f83a0 ti: 866a6000 task.ti: 866a6000 > [ 36.940000] > [ECR ]: 0x00230400 => Misaligned r/w from 0x8677f403 > [ 36.960000] [EFA ]: 0x8677f403 > [ 36.960000] [BLINK ]: mwifiex_scan_networks+0x17a/0x198c [mwifiex] > [ 36.960000] [ERET ]: mwifiex_scan_networks+0x18a/0x198c [mwifiex] > [ 36.980000] [STAT32]: 0x00000206 : K E2 E1 > [ 36.980000] BTA: 0x700736e2 SP: 0x866a7d0c FP: 0x5faddc84 > [ 37.000000] LPS: 0x806a37ec LPE: 0x806a37fa LPC: 0x00000000 > [ 37.000000] r00: 0x8677f401 r01: 0x8668aa08 r02: 0x00000001 > r03: 0x00000000 r04: 0x8668b600 r05: 0x8677f406 > r06: 0x8702b600 r07: 0x00000000 r08: 0x8702b600 > r09: 0x00000000 r10: 0x870b3b00 r11: 0x00000000 > r12: 0x00000000 > [ 37.040000] > [ 37.040000] Stack Trace: > [ 37.040000] mwifiex_scan_networks+0x18a/0x198c [mwifiex] > > Root cause: > mwifiex driver calls is_zero_ether_addr() against byte-aligned address: > > drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/fw.h: > struct mwifiex_scan_cmd_config { > /* > * BSS mode to be sent in the firmware command > */ > u8 bss_mode; > > /* Specific BSSID used to filter scan results in the firmware */ > u8 specific_bssid[ETH_ALEN]; > > ... > } __packed; > > drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/scan.c: > mwifiex_config_scan(..., struct mwifiex_scan_cmd_config *scan_cfg_out, ...) > ... > if (adapter->ext_scan && > !is_zero_ether_addr(scan_cfg_out->specific_bssid)) { > ... > } > > Since firmware-related struct mwifiex_scan_cmd_config cannot be changed, > we need to use the new function is_zero_ether_addr_unaligned() here. > > This is v2 of the original patch: > [PATCH] Modify is_zero_ether_addr() to handle byte-aligned addresses > > Per Joe's suggestion -- instead of modifying is_zero_ether_addr() -- > add is_zero_ether_addr_unaligned() and use it where needed. > > Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Petri Gynther <pgynther@xxxxxxxxxx> Patch set to Rejected. Reason: As is_zero_ether_addr_unaligned() patch is not applied I can't take this. Please resend if that patch is accepted. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9306999/ Documentation about submitting wireless patches and checking status from patchwork: https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches