On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:12:08PM +0200, Christian Lamparter wrote: > On Sunday, September 18, 2016 6:44:08 PM CEST Greg KH wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 02:49:33PM +0200, Christian Lamparter wrote: > > > On Sunday, September 18, 2016 12:14:55 PM CEST Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 10:54:18AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > > > > > Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 09:43:02PM +0200, Christian Lamparter wrote: > > > > > >> Ben Greear reported: > > > > > >> > I see lots of instability as soon as I load up the carl9710 NIC. > > > > > >> > My application is going to be poking at it's debugfs files... > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in carl9170_debugfs_read+0xd5/0x2a0 > > > > > >> > [carl9170] at addr ffff8801bc1208b0 > > > > > >> > Read of size 8 by task btserver/5888 > > > > > >> > ======================================================================= > > > > > >> > BUG kmalloc-256 (Tainted: G W ): kasan: bad access detected > > > > > >> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > INFO: Allocated in seq_open+0x50/0x100 age=2690 cpu=2 pid=772 > > > > > >> >... > > > > > >> > > > > > >> This breakage was caused by the introduction of intermediate > > > > > >> fops in debugfs by commit 9fd4dcece43a > > > > > >> ("debugfs: prevent access to possibly dead file_operations at file open") > > > > > > > > > > > > Because of this, these should all be backported to 4.7-stable, and > > > > > > 4.8-stable, right? > > > Ok, only b43legacy has debugfs enabled by default. For b43 and carl9170 > > > debugfs support is usually disabled. > > > > > > Greg, would you take these four patches "as is" for -stable > > > or do you want a "minimal version" which just replaces the > > > > > > dfops = container_of(file->f_op, ... > > > > > > with > > > > > > dfops = container_of(file->f_path.dentry->d_fsdata, ... > > > > > > in the three drivers for -stable? > > > > No, I'll take this as is, we want things to remain as close as possible > > to Linus's tree. When we are not, is when things break. > > > > > > > Via which tree should these go, Greg's or mine? > > > > > > > > I'll take it if you ack it, as it's a debugfs issue. > > > For carl9170: Ben Greear has reported: > > > "I have verified this fixes my problem in the 4.7 kernel." > > > > > > But this was with a preliminary/minimal version so I didn't > > > add the tested-by tag. > > > > > > As for b43, I'll see if I have a working b43 in my collection > > > somewhere to confirm the issue and the fix. Question is, do > > > you want to wait or not? > > > > I'll queue these up this week, no rush. > > I was able to sucessfully test the b43 patch on my iBook G4's BCM4306. So is that a "Tested-by:"? :)