On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 16:35 +0800, Zhu Yi wrote: > From: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@xxxxxxxxx> > > This patch allows to disable FAT channel in specific configurations. > > For example the configuration (8, +1), (primary channel 8, extension > channel 12) isn't permitted in U.S., but (8, -1), (primary channel 8, > extension channel 4) is. When FAT channel configuration is not > permitted, FAT channel should be reported as not supported in the > capabilities of the HT IE in association request. And sssociation is > performed on 20Mhz channel. Can you explain more in detail the underlying regulatory rules? It seems to me that (12, -1) would be pretty much the same as (8, +1) as far as regulatory is concerned. I'm just thinking about how we should express this in the regulatory database where we're not really concerned with channels but rather allowed bands. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
