On Thu, 2016-09-01 at 20:30 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > > seq=1,frag=0 > > seq=2,frag=0 > > seq=2,frag=1 > > seq=2,frag=1 > > > > if reordering happened? > > (assuming the last line was supposed to read 'seq=1,frag=1') I did actually mean seq=2,frag=1, since the seqno assignment happened after fragmentation in your patch, and after codel reordering, and would not change the seqno until it encountered a frag=0 packet. Or maybe that was only with the previous version of the patch. > When does fragmentation happen anyway? Is it safe to assume there's > no aggregation when it does? > Yes, fragmented packets are not allowed to be aggregated. johannes
