Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] Documentation: dt: net: add ath9k wireless device binding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday 28 August 2016, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sunday, August 21, 2016 4:31:03 PM CEST Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> >> +               ath9k@0,0 {
> >
> > According to the PCI binding, the name should be the same as the
> > compatible string here, or match the class code in the table.
> The original example was from an actual system (where an ath9k is
> connected to the PCIe bug). Unfortunately the PCIe driver contains
> some hacks, so I'm not sure if these values serve as a good example.
> Thus I took an example from a device where the ath9k chip is connected
> via PCI (no "express" - found in sysfs at:
> /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:00:0e.0):
> &pci0 {
>     ath9k@168c,002d {
>         compatible = "pci168c,002d";
>         reg = <0x7000 0 0 0 0>;
>         qca,disable-5ghz;
>     };
> };

Ok, that would be a better example.


> >> +                       compatible = "pci168c,0030";
> >> +                       reg = <0 0 0 0 0>;
> >
> > Are the device/fn numbers all zero on your system? This is a bit
> > confusing, as it's not immediately clear what the reg properties
> > refers to. Also, I think the length should reflect the actual length
> > of the config space, either 0x100 or 0x1000.
> The first issue is solved with the updated example (see above).
> Where would the size go (is it the second-last or last value)?

The last one.

	Arnd



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux