From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Calculating the value in one place rather than using one calculation
in one place and a different one for management frames in another
location makes little sense.
Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
index 6de5b8f..2f951cf 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
@@ -4848,7 +4848,8 @@ static void rtl8xxxu_tx(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
}
}
- if (rate_flag & IEEE80211_TX_RC_MCS)
+ if (rate_flag & IEEE80211_TX_RC_MCS &&
+ !ieee80211_is_mgmt(hdr->frame_control))
rate = tx_info->control.rates[0].idx + DESC_RATE_MCS0;
else
rate = tx_rate->hw_value;
@@ -4869,7 +4870,7 @@ static void rtl8xxxu_tx(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
tx_desc->txdw1 |= cpu_to_le32(TXDESC32_AGG_BREAK);
if (ieee80211_is_mgmt(hdr->frame_control)) {
- tx_desc->txdw5 = cpu_to_le32(tx_rate->hw_value);
+ tx_desc->txdw5 = cpu_to_le32(rate);
tx_desc->txdw4 |=
cpu_to_le32(TXDESC32_USE_DRIVER_RATE);
tx_desc->txdw5 |=
@@ -4923,7 +4924,7 @@ static void rtl8xxxu_tx(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
tx_desc40->txdw2 |= cpu_to_le32(TXDESC40_AGG_BREAK);
if (ieee80211_is_mgmt(hdr->frame_control)) {
- tx_desc40->txdw4 = cpu_to_le32(tx_rate->hw_value);
+ tx_desc40->txdw4 = cpu_to_le32(rate);
tx_desc40->txdw3 |=
cpu_to_le32(TXDESC40_USE_DRIVER_RATE);
tx_desc40->txdw4 |=
--
2.7.4
