From: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Hi, Using complete_all() is not wrong per se but it suggest that there might be more than one reader. For -rt I am reviewing all complete_all() users and would like to leave only the real ones in the tree. The main problem for -rt about complete_all() is that it can be uses inside IRQ context and that can lead to unbounded amount work inside the interrupt handler. That is a no no for -rt. The patches grouped per subsystem and in small batches to allow reviewing. This series ignores all complete_all() usages in the firmware loading path. They will be hopefully address by Luis' sysdata patches [0]. That leaves a couple of complete_all() calls. The first patch fixes a real glitch for the carl9170 driver. I was able to test it because I have the hardware. For the second one I haven't found any dongle with that chip in my drawers. This series against net-next of today. cheers, daniel [0] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1466117661-22075-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx Daniel Wagner (2): carl9170: Fix wrong completion usage ath10k: use complete() instead complete_all() drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c | 16 ++++++++-------- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 2 +- drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/usb.c | 6 ++---- 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) -- 2.7.4