On 1 August 2016 at 12:04, Dave Taht <dave.taht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 1:35 AM, Roman Yeryomin <leroi.lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 7 July 2016 at 19:30, Valo, Kalle <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> >>>> Ideally wake_tx_queue should be used regardless as >>>> it is a requirement for reducing bufferbloat and >>>> implementing airtime fairness in the future. >>>> >>>> However some setups (typically low-end platforms >>>> hosting QCA988X) suffer performance regressions >>>> with the current wake_tx_queue implementation. >>>> Therefore disable it unless it is really >>>> beneficial with current codebase (which is when >>>> firmware supports smart pull-push tx scheduling). >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@xxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> I think it's too late to send this to 4.7 anymore (and this due to my >>> vacation). So I'm planning to queue this to 4.8, but if the feedback is >>> positive we can always send this to a 4.7 stable release. >>> >> >> Sorry guys, drowned. >> So, yes, applying this patch does the job. That is gets me to the >> results similar to >> https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2016-May/041448.html >> >> Going to try latest code on same system... > > Can you try increasing the quantum to 1514, and reducing the codel > target to 5ms? (without this patch?) > So it was 1514 already... Regards, Roman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
