On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 07:53:35PM +1000, Julian Calaby wrote: > Hi Bob, Hi! > > --- a/interface.c > > +++ b/interface.c > > @@ -295,6 +295,10 @@ char *channel_width_name(enum nl80211_chan_width width) > > return "80+80 MHz"; > > case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_160: > > return "160 MHz"; > > + case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_5: > > + return "5 MHz"; > > + case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_10: > > + return "10 MHz"; > > default: > > return "unknown"; > > } > > Judging by the previous two entries, it looks like the case statements > are sorted, so should these ones therefore be at the top of the list? These are sorted by NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_* attribute value, which makes a little more sense to me than sorting by the string or numerically by width, but sure, I can do it either way. -- Bob Copeland %% http://bobcopeland.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
