On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 02:45:25PM +0300, Yaniv Machani wrote:
> When a packet is received for transmission,
> a PREQ frame is sent to resolve the appropriate path to the desired destination.
> After path was established, any sequential PREQ will be sent only after
> dot11MeshHWMPpreqMinInterval, which usually set to few seconds.
>
> This implementation has an impact in cases where we would like to
> resolve the path quickly.
> A clear example is when a peer was disconnected from us,
> while he acted as a hop to our destination.
> Although the path table will be cleared, the next PREQ frame will be sent only after reaching the MinInterval.
> This will cause unwanted delay, possibly of few seconds until the traffic will resume.
>
> if (!(mpath->flags & MESH_PATH_RESOLVING))
> - mesh_queue_preq(mpath, PREQ_Q_F_START);
> + mesh_queue_preq(mpath, PREQ_Q_F_START, true);
What about something like this here instead:
if (!(mpath->flags & MESH_PATH_RESOLVING)) {
/* force next preq to be sent without delay */
ifmsh->last_preq = jiffies - min_preq_int_jiff(sdata) - 1;
mesh_queue_preq(mpath, PREQ_Q_F_START);
}
Maybe a little more magic, but it has a comment explaining it and doesn't
add a bool parameter everywhere. Or, maybe even just do it inside
mesh_queue_preq() based on having PREQ_Q_F_START && !PREQ_Q_F_REFRESH (if
those are the only cases where "true" is passed).
Generally I try to avoid bool parameters where possible because when you
look at a callsite, you don't know immediately what "true" and "false"
mean, and also each one you add doubles the code paths through a given
function.
--
Bob Copeland %% http://bobcopeland.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
