On Mon, 2016-07-18 at 09:38 -0400, Bob Copeland wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 02:45:40PM +0300, Yaniv Machani wrote:
> > The HT capab info field inside the HT capab IE of the mesh beacon
> > is incorrect (in the case of 20MHz channel width).
> > To fix this driver will check configuration from cfg and
> > will build it accordingly.
>
> > + /* determine capability flags */
> > + cap = sband->ht_cap.cap;
> > +
> > + /* if channel width is 20MHz - configure HT capab
> > accordingly*/
> > + if (sdata->vif.bss_conf.chandef.width ==
> > NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_20) {
> > + cap &= ~IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SUP_WIDTH_20_40;
> > + cap &= ~IEEE80211_HT_CAP_DSSSCCK40;
> > + }
>
> Is it required that HT capability match the HT operation in this
> case?
>
Is there ever a case that HT *capability* should be restricted
artificially like that? I can't remember any cases - we do something
like that to work around broken APs in some cases, but here?
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
