Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Add documentation how devicetree can be used to configure ath9k based > devices. > > Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qca,ath9k.txt | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qca,ath9k.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qca,ath9k.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qca,ath9k.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..7c62c59 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qca,ath9k.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ > +* Qualcomm Atheros ath9k wireless devices > + > +This node provides properties for configuring the ath9k wireless device. The > +node is expected to be specified as a child node of the PCI controller to > +which the wireless chip is connected. > + > +Required properties: > +- compatible: Should be "qca,ath9k" Isn't this supposed to use the chipset name? ath9k is the driver name and something like ar9462 is the chip name. I know in ath10k we used "qca,ath10k" but I'm starting to suspect that was a mistake. -- Kalle Valo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
