Dave Taht <dave.taht@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> As for why this would happen... There could be a bug in the dequeue code >> somewhere, but since you get better performance from sticking everything >> into one queue, my best guess would be that the client is choking on the >> interleaved packets? I.e. expending more CPU when it can't stick >> subsequent packets into the same TCP flow? > > I share this concern. > > The quantum is? I am not opposed to a larger quantum (2 full size > packets = 3028 in this case?). The quantum is hard-coded to 300 bytes in the current implementation (see net/fq_impl.h). -Toke -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
