On Sunday, July 10, 2016 10:54:50 PM CEST Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 10:52 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sunday, July 10, 2016 1:28:32 AM CEST Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> >> +- qca,check-eeprom-endianness: When enabled, the driver checks if the
> >> + endianness of the EEPROM (based on the two
> >> + magic bytes at the start of the EEPROM)
> >> + matches the host system's native endianness.
> >> + The data will be swapped accordingly if there
> >> + is a mismatch.
> >> + Leaving this disabled means that the EEPROM
> >> + data will be interpreted in the system's
> >> + native endianness, regardless of the magic
> >> + bytes.
> >> + Enable this option only when the magic bytes
> >> + are known to indicate the correct endianness
> >> + of the EEPROM data, because otherwise the
> >> + EEPROM data may be swapped and thus may be
> >> + parsed incorrectly.
> >
> > Defining properties in terms of "native" endianess is usually not a good
> > idea, as some architectures (ARMv6+, PowerPC, ...) allow running either
> > big-endian or little-endian without changing the endianess of device
> > registers in the process.
> >
> > It's better to document the property as defaulting to a specific endianess
> > unless you have an override or the autodetection flag, regardless of
> > the CPU endianess.
> ath9k reads the data from the EEPROM into memory. With that property
> disabled ath9k simply assumes that the endianness of the values in the
> EEPROM are having the correct endianness for the host system (in other
> words: no swap is being applied).
> I am not sure I understand you correctly, but isn't what you are
> explaining an issue in the ath9k code, rather than in this
> documentation?
I looked at the code more to find that out now, but I'm more confused
now, as the eeprom seems to be read as a byte stream, and the endianess
conversion that the driver performs is not on the data values in it,
but seems to instead swap the bytes in each 16-bit word, regardless
of the contents (the values inside of the byte stream are always
interpreted as big-endian). Is that a correct observation?
What I see in ath_pci_eeprom_read() is that the 16-bit words are taken
from the lower 16 bit of the little-endian AR_EEPROM_STATUS_DATA
register. As this is coming from a PCI register, it must have a device
specific endianess that is identical on all CPUs, so in the description
above, mentioning CPU endianess is a bit confusing. I could not find
the code that does the conditional byteswap, instead this function
static bool ar9300_eeprom_read_byte(struct ath_hw *ah, int address,
u8 *buffer)
{
u16 val;
if (unlikely(!ath9k_hw_nvram_read(ah, address / 2, &val)))
return false;
*buffer = (val >> (8 * (address % 2))) & 0xff;
return true;
}
evidently assumes that the lower 8 bit of the 16-bit data from PCI
come first, i.e. it byteswaps on big-endian CPUs to get the bytestream
back into the order in which it is stored in the EEPROM.
Interestingly, this also seems to happen for ath_ahb_eeprom_read()
even though on that one the value does not get swapped by the bus
accessor, so presumably big-endian machines with a ahb based ath9k
store their eeprom byte-reversed?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
