On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Krishna Chaitanya
<chaitanya.mgit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Karl Beldan <karl.beldan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Chaitanya TK <chaitanya.mgit@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Chaitanya T K <chaitanya.mgit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> If peer support reception of STBC and LDPC, enable them for better
>>> performance.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya TK <chaitanya.mgit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/ieee80211.h | 1 +
>>> net/mac80211/rc80211_minstrel_ht.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++--------
>>> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/ieee80211.h b/include/linux/ieee80211.h
>>> index b118744..4d01130 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/ieee80211.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/ieee80211.h
>>> @@ -1550,6 +1550,7 @@ struct ieee80211_vht_operation {
>>> #define IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_RXSTBC_3 0x00000300
>>> #define IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_RXSTBC_4 0x00000400
>>> #define IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_RXSTBC_MASK 0x00000700
>>> +#define IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_RXSTBC_SHIFT 8
>>> #define IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SU_BEAMFORMER_CAPABLE
>>> 0x00000800
>>> #define IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SU_BEAMFORMEE_CAPABLE
>>> 0x00001000
>>> #define IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_BEAMFORMEE_STS_SHIFT 13
>>> diff --git a/net/mac80211/rc80211_minstrel_ht.c
>>> b/net/mac80211/rc80211_minstrel_ht.c
>>> index 30fbabf..e2fcdea 100644
>>> --- a/net/mac80211/rc80211_minstrel_ht.c
>>> +++ b/net/mac80211/rc80211_minstrel_ht.c
>>> @@ -1166,13 +1166,14 @@ minstrel_ht_update_caps(void *priv, struct
>>> ieee80211_supported_band *sband,
>>> struct minstrel_ht_sta_priv *msp = priv_sta;
>>> struct minstrel_ht_sta *mi = &msp->ht;
>>> struct ieee80211_mcs_info *mcs = &sta->ht_cap.mcs;
>>> - u16 sta_cap = sta->ht_cap.cap;
>>> + u16 ht_cap = sta->ht_cap.cap;
>>> struct ieee80211_sta_vht_cap *vht_cap = &sta->vht_cap;
>>> int use_vht;
>>> int n_supported = 0;
>>> int ack_dur;
>>> int stbc;
>>> int i;
>>> + bool ldpc;
>>>
>>> /* fall back to the old minstrel for legacy stations */
>>> if (!sta->ht_cap.ht_supported)
>>> @@ -1210,16 +1211,24 @@ minstrel_ht_update_caps(void *priv, struct
>>> ieee80211_supported_band *sband,
>>> }
>>> mi->sample_tries = 4;
>>>
>>> - /* TODO tx_flags for vht - ATM the RC API is not fine-grained
>>> enough */
>>> if (!use_vht) {
>>> - stbc = (sta_cap & IEEE80211_HT_CAP_RX_STBC) >>
>>> + stbc = (ht_cap & IEEE80211_HT_CAP_RX_STBC) >>
>>> IEEE80211_HT_CAP_RX_STBC_SHIFT;
>>> - mi->tx_flags |= stbc << IEEE80211_TX_CTL_STBC_SHIFT;
>>>
>>> - if (sta_cap & IEEE80211_HT_CAP_LDPC_CODING)
>>> - mi->tx_flags |= IEEE80211_TX_CTL_LDPC;
>>> + if (ht_cap & IEEE80211_HT_CAP_LDPC_CODING)
>>> + ldpc = true;
>>> + } else {
>>> + stbc = (vht_cap->cap & IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_RXSTBC_MASK) >>
>>> + IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_RXSTBC_SHIFT;
>>> +
>>> + if (vht_cap->cap & IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_RXLDPC)
>>> + ldpc = true;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + mi->tx_flags |= stbc << IEEE80211_TX_CTL_STBC_SHIFT;
>>> + if (ldpc)
>>> + mi->tx_flags |= IEEE80211_TX_CTL_LDPC;
>>> +
>>
>>
>> Here you are using ldpc uninitialized.
>>
>>
>> As for the idea, ldpc and stbc support/enable in HT and VHT being
>> independant and tx_flags being shared by all the info.rates, you cannot use
>> it as you are trying to (e.g. you might end up asking lower layers to send
>> stbc/vht with a hw only supporting stbc/ht or/and trying to send stbc/vht
>> with inappropriate advertised vht caps).
> The design in minstrel is it checks only for peers capabilities and it doesn't
> check local hw capabilities (except for those in MCS_GROUPS), so minstrel
> just informs the we can use STBC/LDPC, its HW's decision whether to
> actually use or not.
>> This stems from the STBC/LDPC CTL flags being a mac80211_tx_info_flags, this
>> is what should be changed.
> I understand the problem here, if all rates are same then its no problem.
> But if some rates are HT and some are VHT, then we might end up in problem.
>
> To solve this, we need to move this to mac80211_rate_control_flags so that
> we can convey per rate info.
Karl/Johannes,
Any thoughts on this? This impacts all drivers, so it would be good
to finalize on design before submitting patches.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
