On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 02:13:05PM +0300, Yaniv Machani wrote: > From: Maital Hahn <maitalm@xxxxxx> > > Once receiving a CLOSE action frame from the disconnecting peer, > flush all entries in the path table which has this peer as the > next hop. Please address the user-visible behavior in your commit messages. Does it crash? Does it send frames to an invalid peer? Do frames get dropped? > In addition, upon receiving a packet, if next hop is not found, > trigger PERQ immidiatly, instead of just putting it in the queue. "PREQ" Please split this into a separate patch that we can review separately (and also give the "why" in the commit log). > Signed-off-by: Maital Hahn <maitalm@xxxxxx> > Acked-by: Yaniv Machani <yanivma@xxxxxx> > --- > net/mac80211/cfg.c | 1 + > net/mac80211/mesh.c | 3 ++- > net/mac80211/mesh_hwmp.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- > 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/mac80211/cfg.c b/net/mac80211/cfg.c > index 0c12e40..f876ef7 100644 > --- a/net/mac80211/cfg.c > +++ b/net/mac80211/cfg.c > @@ -1011,6 +1011,7 @@ static void sta_apply_mesh_params(struct ieee80211_local *local, > if (sta->mesh->plink_state == NL80211_PLINK_ESTAB) > changed = mesh_plink_dec_estab_count(sdata); > sta->mesh->plink_state = params->plink_state; > + mesh_path_flush_by_nexthop(sta); This isn't necessary, caller should already be doing mesh_path_flush_by_nexthop() in every case I could see. Besides it cannot be done under plink lock. > +++ b/net/mac80211/mesh.c > @@ -159,7 +159,8 @@ void mesh_sta_cleanup(struct sta_info *sta) > if (!sdata->u.mesh.user_mpm) { > changed |= mesh_plink_deactivate(sta); > del_timer_sync(&sta->mesh->plink_timer); > - } > + } else > + mesh_path_flush_by_nexthop(sta); And this is already fixed in mac80211-next. -- Bob Copeland %% http://bobcopeland.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html