Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > For A-MPDU all MPDU rx status (except last one) should share the same > timestamp. Last one has a different one so all you need is to > distinguish first and last MPDU. Non A-MPDU obviously are special case > (status bits are pricky). Right. So comparing the rs_stamp between first and last MPDU should give the duration of the entire thing? This would require keeping state between subsequent calls to the RX handler. Also, what happens if the last MPDU is lost? >> Is the entire A-MPDU received before the RX handler is called for the >> first frame? > > No idea. Maybe it is as there's distinction between "more" and > "moreaggr". Hmm. If it is, comparing the stamp of the first MPDU to the current time (when handling it) should give the needed duration? Will try doing that and see what the result is. -Toke -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
