On Thursday 22 May 2008 21:03:01 Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 20:52 +0200, Stefanik Gábor wrote: > > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Johannes Berg > > <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> >> This does not work, since we use injection for other types of > > >> >> frames. For example management frames from hostapd. We don't want > > >> >> (and can't) make hostapd keep track of sequence numbers. > > >> >> You'll have to contact radiotap people and add a flag for this. > > >> >> This would also solve the hardware counter problem then. > > > > > >> The flag is IEEE80211_TX_INJECTED. Here is a new patch, for the > > >> current wireless-testing: > > > > > > Reorder the two blocks and you have your answer. NO. > > > > > > johannes > > > > > > > Hmm, shouldn't this version fix the hostap and other non-monitor-mode cases? > > No, because hostapd uses monitor interfaces. Give up, it doesn't work > without an extra radiotap flag. Well, don't give up, but please contact the radiotap people for adding such a flag to the header. That's really the only way to go. There are more flags to be added, like we-are-not-interested-in-acks. -- Greetings Michael. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
