> And the patchset I was testing included your fq_codel port for ath9k > but it was based on codel5.h. Michal's latest stuff reworked mainline > codel to be generically usable, and it *is* a different variant of the > algorithm. I think you probably do understand what you are doing and which patch is which, but I want to make sure that everyone else (and you, just in case) understands that my patch to ath9k hooks ath9k up to the new mac80211 per-station and per-tid intermediate queues and does *not* have any codel or fq stuff in it, and is useful and worth doing even if you aren't taking the codel and fq stuff. (I didn't port any fq_codel stuff to ath9k.) My ath9k patch is a prerequisite for people who want to take Michal's mac80211 fq and mac80211 codel stuff for a test drive on an ath9k interface. (Otherwise the ath9k uses the old transmit path through mac80211 which wouldn't touch Michal's fq and codel tweaks to mac80211's new intermediate queues.) But it is useful and there are some benefits to it (especially with Michal's IFF_NO_QUEUE) even without the fq and codel stuff. -Tim Shepard shep@xxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
