On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 08:01:59AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > For a future patch, "sizeof(mask_m)" or even just:
> >
> > u8 mask_m[123] = {0};
> >
> > ... would be better here. I looked at this bit and thought, no way is
> > "123" actually correct. Lo and behold, that is actually the number of
> > array elements, whether that has a basis in something real or not :)
>
> If you already on it can you please rework it on top of this patch?
> This complete function can be probably reworked.
I wasn't on it, but yeah I'll send a patch on top of this momentarily :)
--
Bob Copeland %% http://bobcopeland.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
