On Thu, 2016-03-31 at 15:50 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:46:45AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > > > > In this case, I think perhaps you can just patch your local system > > with > > the many interfaces connecting to the same AP to add the parameter > > Herbert suggested (.insecure_elasticity = true in sta_rht_params). > > This > > is, after all, very much a case that "normal" operation doesn't > > even > > get close to. > I think you should just turn it on everywhere for mac80211. Chain > length checks simply don't make sense when you allow duplicate > keys in the hash table. Yes, that's a good point, and we can - in certain corner cases - end up with duplicate keys even in normal operation. Does removing this completely disable the "-EEXIST" error? I can't say I fully understand the elasticity stuff in __rhashtable_insert_fast(). johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
