Hello, On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 05:24:05PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > But does that actually work? It's pointless to add WQ_MEM_RECLAIM to > > workqueues unless all other things are also guaranteed to make forward > > progress regardless of memory pressure. > > It's supposed to work. > > Also note there was a bunch of work done to allow swap on NFS: see > a564b8f0 "nfs: enable swap on NFS". Alright, WQ_MEM_RECLAIM for ethernet devices, then. > I use NFS mounts over wifi at home. I may just be odd. I seem to > recall some bug reports about suspend vs. NFS--were those also on > laptops using NFS? > > I wonder if home media centers might do writes over wifi to network > storage? > > Googling for "nfs wifi" turns up lots of individuals doing this. > > My first impulse is to say that it's probably not perfect but that we > shouldn't make it worse. If everything else is working, I'd be happy to throw in WQ_MEM_RECLAIM but I really don't want to add it if it doesn't actually achieve the goal. Can a wireless person chime in here? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
